South African Medical Care Co-operative

Your partner in health

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Welcome to the SAMCC

The Discovery Health GP Network

E-mail Print PDF
The SAMCC is pleased to announce that the IPA movement, through the excellent offices of Prof M N Chetty, has been working closely with
 Discovery Health during 2009. It now takes pleasure in announcing that it has succeeded in restructuring GP benefits for patients on Discovery Health, from Jan 2010.
 
A New Discovery Health GP Network will be formed to replace the previous Discovery GP network. From 2010, those GPs who wish to participate will received the 2010 new consultation rate of R270.00. There will also be an increase in the number of consultations allowed at the GP as well as guaranteed payment of GP accounts even when the patients savings account is depleted in 97% of Discovery Health options. Thus from 2010, patients will almost never run dry of benefits to see a GP, as described in the document below.
 
In return GPs must undertake that:
  • They will not balance bill Discovery Health patients.
  • The new GPs network will agree to utilise the new Discovery Health Pathology Forms.
  • GPs will agree to an accreditation process of their practices to ensure standards of safety and efficiency.
  • GPs will utilise the DH formulary for chronic medication.
This is not going to appeal to all members of the IPA however many who serviced Discovery Patients in the past will find this enhancement encouraging.
 
Remember however that “Cash is King”. Where and whenever you are able to transact directly with your patient, you cut out your admin and maximize your income.
 

 
11 September 2009
 
Discovery Health’s new GP network: benefiting both GPs and their patients

We are pleased to announce that Discovery Health will be introducing a new and enhanced GP network from January 2010. 

 

This follows an extensive process of consultation and discussion between Discovery Health and an expert advisory panel, representing the GP leadership in South Africa. Through this collaboration, we have produced a structure that recognizes the pivotal role played by the GP in the healthcare system, promotes quality and efficiency and aims to reduce members’ gaps in cover.

The new network replaces the existing Discovery GP network and now offers GPs the following enhanced benefits:

 

  • For Executive, Comprehensive and Priority Plan members, this incorporates unlimited GP consults (paid initially from Medical Savings Account (MSA), then from insured benefits). No more member co-payments!
  • For Classic Saver and Coastal Saver Plan members, this incorporates an additional 3 network GP visits for a single person, and 6 network GP visits for a family, once the MSA is exhausted.
  • For Classic Saver and Coastal Saver Plan members, this incorporates an additional 3 network GP visits for a single person, and 6 network GP visits for a family, once the MSA is exhausted.
  • For the Essential Saver Plan members, this incorporates an additional 2 network GP visits for a single person, and 4 network GP visits for a family, once the MSA is exhausted.

 

As a result, GPs will now be assured that their consultation fees will be fully covered and paid directly to their practice for over 97% of their Discovery Health patients who have selected plans that offer day-to-day cover. This will significantly reduce the GPs’ administration and financial risk.
  • GPs will also benefit from the higher consultation fee of R270.
  • GPs will also benefit from the higher consultation fee of R270.

Participating GPs will agree to provide their Discovery Health patients with the following:

 

  • Ensure that members have access to quality and efficient care provided by GPs who subscribe to quality and efficiency requirements. For example, the practices of all participating GPs will be subject to a facility accreditation process, based on international best practice guidelines.
  • GPs will also undertake to work with Discovery Health to eliminate or minimise shortfalls in cover, for example by not balance billing Discovery Health members and by using the Discovery Health pathology form.  GPs will also use their best endeavours to prescribe chronic medicine that is on the Discovery Health formulary as well as generic medicine, without in any way compromising quality of care.
  • GPs will participate in a mentoring programme with their peers to ensure that the highest quality and efficiency standards are continually upheld.
  • Clear signage will help members identify GPs participating in the network.

 

Participation in the Discovery Health GP Network is voluntary and is open to all GPs.

Significant effort has been invested in enhancing the GP network, which is the first of its kind locally and perhaps internationally to have a non-negotiable commitment to quality entrenched in the foundation of the network. It embodies best practice principles and represents a win-win situation between Discovery Health and the GPs in which objectives are totally aligned around the best interests of the patient. 

Watch out for more details of the Discovery Health GP Network

We will send out more details of the Discovery Health GP Network to all GPs within the next few weeks.

Last Updated on Thursday, 17 September 2009 09:44
 

Influenza A(H1N1): Home Care Guidance: Directions to Patients

E-mail Print PDF

Home Care Guidance: Doctors/Nurses directions to Patients/Parents 

1.    You will probably be sick for several days with fever and respiratory symptoms.

2.    Take Medications as Prescribed:

a.     Take all of the antiviral medication as directed (where applicable).

b.     Continue to cover your cough and wash your hands often (even when taking antiviral medications), to prevent spreading influenza to others.

c.     Call the clinic/GP if you (or your child) experience any side effects; i.e. nausea, vomiting, rash, or unusual behaviour.

d.     Take medications for symptom relief as needed for fever and pain such as paracetamol or ibuprofen. These medicines do not need to be taken regularly if your symptoms improve.

e.     Do not give aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) or products that contain aspirin to children or teenagers 18 years old or younger.

f.      Children younger than 4 years of age should not be given over-the-counter cold medications without first speaking with a health care provider. 

3.    Seek Emergency Care:

If your child experiences any of the following:

a.     Fast breathing or trouble breathing.

b.     Bluish or grey skin colour.

c.     Not drinking enough fluids.

d.     Severe or persistent vomiting.

e.     Not waking up or not interacting.

f.      Being so irritable that the child does not want to be held.

g.     Flu-like symptoms improve but then return with fever and worse cough.

In adults, emergency warning signs that need urgent medical attention include:

a.     Difficulty breathing or shortness of breath.

b.     Pain or pressure in the chest or abdomen.

c.     Sudden dizziness.

d.     Confusion.

e.     Severe or persistent vomiting.

f.      Flu-like symptoms improve but then return with fever and worse cough.

4.    Follow These Home Care Recommendations:

a.     Stay home for 7 days after your symptoms begin or until you have been symptom-free for 24 hours, whichever is longer.

b.     Drink clear fluids (such as water, broth, sports drinks, electrolyte beverages for infants) to keep from being dehydrated.

c.     Dishes can be done with hot soapy water.

d.     Throw away tissues and other disposable items used by the sick person in the trash. Wash your hands after touching used tissues and similar waste.

e.     Have everyone in the household wash hands often with soap and water, especially after coughing or sneezing. Alcohol based hand cleaners are also effective.

f.      Avoid touching your eyes, nose and mouth. Germs spread this way.

g.     Continue with medication for chronic diseases as prescribed (e.g. ART).

Revised Version 2 - Last updated: 22 July 2009. Developed by:

  • The National Institute for Communicable Diseases (NICD) of the National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS) - NICD Website: www.nicd.ac.za
  • In collaboration with The South African National Department of Health and World Health Organisation (WHO) - World Health Organisation Website: www.who.int/csr/disease/swineflu/en/
Last Updated on Thursday, 13 August 2009 02:10
 

National Health Insurance is coming so listen up...

E-mail Print PDF

At a recent doctor meeting in the Eastern Cape, addressed by informed sources from Government speaking on NHI, the following was pointed out to us:

  • A National Health System WILL replaces the current system of fragmented care of Public and Private patients in the RSA system.
  • Health care is responsible for 8.5% of the Gross National Product (GDP) of RSA. Of this 8.5% of GDP, 5% of all health expenditure is spent on 14 % of the population, whilst the balance of 3.5% is spent on the remaining 86% of the population.
  • In 2006, the total expenditure on health was R117 billion, of which R57 billion was spent in the public sector and R 59 billion, was spent on the public sector.
  • R2 645.00 was spent on every patient in the public sector, compared to R9 349.00 on every patient in the private sector.
  • There are 12.5 doctors for every 10 000 patients in the private sector, compared with 2.7 doctors for every 10 000 patients in the public sector.
  • There are 54.8 private hospital beds for every 10,000 of the population in the private sector versus 37.5 public hospital beds for every 10,000 of the population.

A further fourteen clear points were made:

  1. The South African President places a huge emphasis on delivery of service.
  2. NHI stems from a constitutional mandate, i.e. from the majority of voters in RSA.
  3. Implementation of an NHI will cost in the region of R2 000 000 000 per year (2 Billion Rand).
  4. R1 000 000 000 is available from the United Nations as a loan to the SA Government at 3% interest p.a.
  5. There is huge potential for increased patient numbers in the General Practitioners sector.
  6. GPs will service patients on the basis of Capitation.
  7. The Government is determined to implement NHI within 5 years from 2009 i.e. by 2014.
  8. There will apparently be significant savings from administrator fees as well as from broker fees.
  9. Budgets will be devolved from national to provincial and local levels.
  10. Preference will be given to multi disciplinary health teams e.g. multi disciplinary practices under one roof like GPs, physios, OTs, specialists practicing from one centre.
  11. A discussion document will be released soon by Government and all stakeholders will be approached.
  12. There appears to be a realisation that the process cannot be fast tracked and that caution should prevail.
  13. There is an appreciation that the private sector is an asset and must continue albeit in a different manner.
  14. State hospitals must be continuously revitalised.

The devil is however in the detail, and none of us, bar a privileged few, have been privy to the Government’s thoughts on the details on the NHI.

Real fears exist relating to mass emigration of highly mobile young doctors leaving the older guys with waning skills to run a health care sector which is straining at the seams, and quite frankly, crumbling, in the public sector.

The skill, going forward, will be to harness the power, willingness and skills of the private sector without destroying it or mortally wounding it in a manner which is sadly all too familiar in the public sector.

It is for you all to watch the IPA Newsletters & publications, emails & website to remain up to speed with NHI. 

Your regional IPAs are a representative of your practice on the national stage via the SAMCC which is in communication with Government.

Dr Tony Behrman
SAMCC Communications

 

The IPA Foundation

E-mail Print PDF

The IPA Foundation: Your link with the newest in Progressive managed care and Health Management strategies.

You will by now have received communication about the IPA Foundation in the Bankmed electronic newsletter. Your IPA has also mentioned this entity when communication the new Bankmed fees to you in the last few newsletters.

The organisation has now really grown “legs” and will, we all hope, deliver more work to more IPA members. IPA member doctors will assure the highest quality and standards, ethics and norms of good practice when dealing with the patients, and by doing so, guarantee an ever larger flow of patients from other medical schemes which up to now paid scant regard to the will of doctors at the coalface.

The 3 major national organisations of IPAs have come together in a unique , non-partisan manner to form this Section 21 company , with the goals and aims of better care to more people given by quality assured , committed GPs who belong to regional IPAs which make up the large parent body of the Foundation.

ASAIPA, SP Net and the SAMCC are all represented with directors on this BOD as well as with office bearers in its day to day functioning and running.

As you will recall the SAMCC is the parent body to 13 regional IPAs, including the giants of KZNMCC, CPCQCare, and ECIPA, BIPA, GMCC, and a host of smaller IPAS all of which form an integral matrix of organisations which share information and data to the betterment of patients and doctors alike.

Prof Morgan Chetty of the SAMCC is the current first Chairman of the IPA Foundation, with Dr Lex Visser of ASAIPA as the current CEO.

Dr Elija Nkosi , representing the SP Net organisation is the Chairman of the Accreditation committee.

Drs Tony Behrman and Jeff Govender make up the remaining Board of directors of the IPA Foundation.

Visit the IPA Foundation website for more information (www.ipafoundation.co.za), which has already succeeded in achieving a consultation fee of R250.00 per patient for you from Bankmed.

Furthermore every Bankmed patient , every year MUST undergo a Personal Health Assessment (PHA). Although this only earns a rate of R 140.00 per patient, it can be done in a relatively short period of time and a family of 4 will earn you R560.00. Much of the PHA is questionnaire driven and can be completed by the patients.

If the patient comes in for a consultation and requests his PHA to be preformed at the same time , then you may charge the R250.00 plus the PHA fee of R 140.00. If the patient only comes in for a PHA form to be completed, then you may only charge R140 and not add the consultation fee.

Furthermore, if at the time of completing a PHA a genuine problem is detected requiring a full consultation , you may charge for the PHA ( R140) plus the Consultation (R250).

You will realise that this is the exception and not the rule. Do not ruin it for others by trying to combine the 2 entities every time you see a Bankmed patient , as Care gauge will be out there measuring you against all other willing providers, and you will just lose the opportunity to progress to better offers in the future.

So , go out there and perform your Bankmed patients’ PHAs wherever and when ever you are able to do so, and make the IPA Foundation’s first project work for everyone!

Bankmed consultants will be visiting you to clarify your queries and smooth the process as best they can , and remember your IPA consultant or office is only a phone call away.

Visit the www.ipafoundation.co.za  in the links section for more information on the PHA and to download the PHA questionnaires.

Dr Tony Behrman
SAMCC Communications

Last Updated on Friday, 10 July 2009 17:27
 

CPC/Qualicare Open Day 2009

E-mail Print PDF

CPC/Qualicare held another very successful Open Day on the 20th June 2009.

Bearing n mind that the conference started early on Saturday morning, the turn-out was outstanding, with not many seats left in the auditorium.

Topics were varied, and the presenters kept the audience's attention throughout with their outstanding presntations.

The Open Day was well supported by general practitioners and sponsors alike, with well over 50 sponsor stands setup to interact with the delegates.

The entire staff of CPC/Qualicare under the leadership of Drs Solly Lison and Tony Behrman need to be congratulated for their slick conference. There is no doubt that the event is a well support Western Cape confrence that will grow from strength to strength in the years to come.

 

 

 

 

 

Last Updated on Friday, 10 July 2009 10:48
 
  • «
  •  Start 
  •  Prev 
  •  1 
  •  2 
  •  Next 
  •  End 
  • »


Page 1 of 2

Who's Online

We have 2 guests online

News Feed

News
  • Fierce Q&A: MetroHealth gets patient-centric with outpatient care

    As the industry shifts toward a patient-centered model, outpatient care is becoming more important to hospitals' missions and bottom lines. Hospitals across the country are increasingly investing in outpatient services, bringing cost-effective, patient-friendly and accessible care away from urban hospital campuses to local community settings.

    One regional example of the trend is found in Ohio, where healthcare organizations have been seeing a growth in newly opened outpatient facilities and increased outpatient staff hiring this year. And less than two weeks ago, Cleveland's MetroHealth System broke ground on its newest suburban health center.

    So FierceHealthcare caught up with MetroHealth's William R. Lewis (pictured), chairman of the market development campaign, leader of the network expansion initiative and chief of clinical cardiology at MetroHealth Medical Center, to talk about the system's expansion into outpatient care and how the new MetroHealth Middleburg Heights Health Center will work to provide quality care outside the main hospital walls.

    FierceHealthcare: Why did MetroHealth decide to move primary and specialty care services out to the suburbs? What were the main factors in the outpatient planning process?

    William Lewis: First of all, we believe this is the way healthcare is going to be delivered in the future. We need to deliver healthcare in the community because that's where patients are demanding healthcare be delivered. So while not everything can be delivered there--we're not going to do cardiac bypass surgery, for example--we want to provide those things that can be done in the community in the community. It's mostly because we are being patient-centric. Patients want care there, and that's what we're going to do.

    Second, we believe this is an efficient way to provide healthcare. In a large hospital system, in a main campus-type hospital system, it's difficult to provide high-quality care efficiently. So the goal is to try to do that in the community.

    The third thing that's really important about this is that MetroHealth has a narrow network healthcare plan (MetroHealth Select) that we have been offering to county employees, municipal employees and a variety of other entities. That plan involves the delivery of healthcare to its insured in Cuyahoga County, and we need to be convenient for individuals to whom were delivering the program. If we're going to offer companies a healthcare program like that, we're going to have to be present in the communities were their employees live. So we need to be in all parts of Cuyahoga County. So this building is really one of several that were looking to put in the county.

    FH: How will the move benefit the health system and its patients?

    Lewis: One of the things we've noticed is that MetroHealth is one of the best kept secrets in Cuyahoga County. We don't want it to be secret anymore; we would like people to know about all of the care we provide. Putting a building in a very visible location and having a specific design that will say to people "We are MetroHealth" will bring more patients into the MetroHealth system and let that secret out a little bit.

    We believe patients will want to come to see our physicians there--they're faculty of Case Western Reserve University. They are outstanding physicians, and we've really kept them a secret from people in a variety of communities. So that's one advantage to both MetroHealth and patients.

    Obviously, being in the community is an advantage to patients--it's very patient-centric. For example, if I'm seeing a dermatologist, I don't think I should have to go to a main campus to have my dermatological problems taken care of. I should be able to be seen by a physician in my community to provide that. If you're seeing a physical therapist three times a week, you really don't want to travel a long distance to do that. We would love to provide our care to our patients in their community. So we look at this as though we are the patient and we're figuring out. If we are the patient, what services would we want to have provided in our local community?

    FH: What enables MetroHealth to deliver a range of healthcare services on an outpatient basis?

    Lewis: There are three factors. One is the service needs to provided in ambulatory setting. For instance, we're not going to do major surgeries in the local communities. So the service has to be something that can practically be provided in the community.

    The second thing is we have to have the physicians who are able to travel and be in those locations. We have high-quality physicians who are capable of providing care, and where they provide that care is really up to us. We decided as system that we're going to provide care in that location and those physicians are happy to oblige that.

    The third thing is that you have to have the equipment needed to provide care. If I'm a cardiologist and a patient needs to have a stress test done, we need to be able to provide the stress testing equipment in that local area. We need to provide the range of imagine services, physical therapy and occupational therapy. We need to be able to provide all of those services to patients and there's equipment required to do that.

    FH: What is MetroHealth's approach to running outpatient facilities? Does it use in-house management, partnerships with physicians, joint ventures?

    Lewis: We're currently looking at options with respect to how we would staff those locations. Because we are a county institution, we are limited in terms of what we can do. But we're going to explore those opportunities to the fullest. There are a large number of physicians who want to partner with MetroHealth in the community to be able to provide care. Many of those physicians will want to be part of the MetroHealth system; many will want to partner with MetroHealth.

    FH: Does the system have other plans to expand its outpatient presence?

    Lewis: Absolutely. The first thing we need to do is expand our locations. We have done that with smaller facilities in the outreaches of Cuyahoga County where we have not really been in the past. We are now in the far western suburbs and the far eastern suburbs.

    This building is replacing a very busy practice in Strongsville. So we are expanding, but we're doing it carefully by making these buildings an extension of programs that we already have in place in those locations. So we're not going to build this from scratch and say, "now we built this, let's fill it up." We're going to build the facility as a replacement for a practice that's already in place, and we began building those practices several years ago.

    We also need to look at what we're doing in the inner potions of Cuyahoga County and make appropriate services available to them as well. So we're going to be looking to expand what we do in those locations too.

    FH:  As part of a larger shift toward outpatient care, how is MetroHealth dealing with increased competition from the dramatic growth in freestanding facilities and retail clinics? 

    Lewis: I think patients want to have their care delivered in a system. They want to know that this care is not just one-stop-shopping; it is going to be delivered as a part of their overall healthcare. Going to a doc-in-the-box, if you will, is not contiguous care with a primary care physician. It is care that's delivered on an interim basis and therefore the records are not stored in a singular location. There's no continuity of the physician care in those kinds of circumstances. Our proposal is to be able to provide that convenient care, but to do it as part of a continuous, collaborative relationship with a primary care physician.

    FH: Are patients catching on to the trend of bringing care away from hospital campuses? How have they responded?

    Lewis: Patients love this. They love to see a cardiologist in their community, they love to see specialists in their community and they like to see their primary care physician.

    What people worry about in seeing physicians in their community is the quality of the care. They want to be sure that the quality of the care they're going to get is high.

    MetroHealth has consistently provided and has been given awards for the type of quality care we provide. As I mentioned, our physicians are all faculty of Case Western Reserve University. Patients can walk into a MetroHealth facility with the confidence that the physician quality is going to be excellent. So I think that patients love to see their physicians in a location that is convenient, as long as they can be assured the quality is going to be high.

    FH: What advice would you give to other healthcare organizations looking to use outpatient care to save money and improve access to care?

    Lewis: They should look at the way healthcare is going to be delivered in several years, not the way it is delivered today. At MetroHealth, we're building for the future. And when you build for the future, you look and try to predict how healthcare is going to be delivered then. The old days of having monstrous hospitals and having patients come from all over the city or county to see you, those are going to be over very soon. And healthcare is going to need to be efficient, high-quality and also convenient for patients.

    Editor's note: This interview has been edited for length and for clarity.

  • Nonprofit hospitals target increased spending on health IT

    Most nonprofit hospitals plan to increase capital spending (45 percent) or stick to current spending levels (35 percent) over the next five years, according to new a Fitch Ratings survey. And the bulk of those growing investments will go towards health information technology.

    Nonprofit hospitals rated health IT as 1.7 on a scale from 1 to 5 (the least important), as it would help them control costs, improve quality and adjust to new reimbursement models.

    However, investment in inpatient facilities was considered the lowest priority (3.9), according to the ratings agency. In fact, 73 percent said their inpatient facilities and capacity are adequate for the next five years.

    Amid the trend of healthcare consolidation, the survey also showed that nonprofit hospitals are teaming up with other healthcare organizations to better achieve strategic benefits like a wider range of operations and more diverse service offerings.

    The ratings agency's findings are similar to a survey released earlier this month by Premier Inc., which found that most of the hospitals planning to increase capital spending this year are directing their biggest investments toward health IT and telecommunications.

    For more:
    - here's the Fitch statement
    - check out the survey (registration required)

    Related Articles:
    Children's hospitals have stronger financial bearings
    Higher-spending hospitals see better emergency outcomes
    Fitch predicts weak patient volumes for-profit hospitals in 2012
    EHR incentive payments boost for-profit hospitals' revenue

  • 10 core measures to evaluate patient-centered medical homes

    The success of patient-centered medical homes should be based on the two domains of outcomes--cost/utilization and clinical quality, independent research foundation Commonwealth Fund reported Wednesday.

    With more than 90 commercial health plans, 42 states and three federal initiatives participating in medical homes, thousands of providers are experimenting with the model and offering a promising solution to primary and patient-centered care, the report explains. However, there are no standardized guidelines for how to measure the success of the new approach to care. Seventy-five researchers through the Commonwealth Fund PCMH Evaluators' Collaborative identified a core set of standardized measures to evaluate the patient-centered medical home.

    The core measures look at utilization (measures for emergency department visits, acute inpatient admissions and readmissions within 30 days) and total costs per member per month, including high-risk patients. Focusing on preventive care, chronic disease management, acute care, overuse and safety, the adult quality measures include the following:

    1. Adult weight screening and follow-up
    2. Medication management with people with asthma
    3. Breast cancer screening
    4. Colorectal cancer screening
    5. Cholesterol management for patients with cardiovascular conditions
    6. Imaging use for low back pain
    7. Pneumonia vaccination status for older patients
    8. Annual monitoring for patients on persistent medications
    9. Controlling high blood pressure
    10. Comprehensive diabetes care

    Many of the measures particularly focus on offering comprehensive care to diabetics, including hemoglobin testing, blood pressure control, eye exam and medical attention for nephropathy, among other measures.

    For more information:
    - read the Commonwealth Fund announcement and report (.pdf)

    Related Articles:
    Interview: Independence Blue Cross has big dreams for medical home model
    Medical home beats P4P in quality improvement
    Horizon medical home project cuts readmissions by 25%
    6 best practices of patient-centered medical homes
    Medical home cost savings questioned

  • Healthcare continues to face talent shortage

    Healthcare has the most job openings for physicians in family medicine, emergency medicine and internal medicine, employers reported in the first quarter, according to healthcare recruiting firm HealtheCareers Network. While employers reported that doctor positions make up 45 percent of vacancies, nursing accounted for 20 percent. Five percent of job openings were for nurse practitioners and 6 percent were for physician assistants, the report states.

    "The healthcare industry continues to endure a serious talent shortage that we expect to only grow should healthcare reform be signed into law and millions of newly insured Americans require care by qualified medical professionals," HealtheCareers CEO Mike Tansey said in an announcement yesterday. Report (registration required)

  • State medical boards disciplining more docs

    State medical boards punished 6.8 percent more dangerous doctors last year, with disciplinary actions rising from 5,652 in 2010 to 6,034 actions in 2011, according to a new report from the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB).

    The FSMB said the increased discipline likely stemmed from better training and accreditation of investigators, improved communication and reciprocity between states, and streamlined reporting between the National Practitioner Data Bank and various state physician licensing agencies, HealthLeaders Media reported.

    But despite the uptick, a report from consumer watchdog Public Citizen noted that the state medical boards still are falling short on protecting patients from inferior care, thanks partly to shrinking state budgets.

    While last year's rate of serious actions per 1,000 physicians (3.06) increased slightly from 2010, it is still significantly lower than the peak rate in 2004 of 3.72 serious actions, according to a Public Citizen statement yesterday.  

    The watchdog group also raised concerns that most states are underdisciplining physicians with less severe actions like fines and reprimands, as opposed revoking licenses for serious offenses.

    Using FSMB data, Public Citizen found that South Carolina has done the worst job of disciplining doctors in the nation, only taking 1.33 serious actions per 1,000 physicians in 2011. Wyoming's board had the highest physician penalty rate, with 6.79 serious actions--five times as much as South Carolina.

    "There's really no difference in the quality of doctors from state to state," Sidney Wolfe, director of Public Citizen's Health Research Group, told HealthLeaders. "What's different is the quality of the state medical boards," he said.

    The watchdog group, in its report, recommends boards have high-quality leadership and conduct proactive investigations rather than react to complaints to efficiently protect patients.

    To learn more:
    - check out the FSMB report (.pdf)
    - here's the Public Citizen report (.pdf) and statement
    - read the HealthLeaders article

    Related Articles:
    State med boards group issues social media rules for docs
    State boards lax on abusive healthcare workers
    State medical board fails to discipline, disclose bad docs
    Study: Medical board discipline varies widely